Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Triumph for latest Mail campaign
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
Mr Reason |
Ahh, but there lies the great debate about sex education vs. sexual liberation vs. corrupting influenece of porn in all its forms................
My view? Porn is all too pervasive and fragmented in its forms
If porn was man/ woman missionary, fine. If porn was man / man / woman / woman and available via legal channels, fine...............BUT, and IT'S a BIG BUT...........
Porn is available in absolutely ALL flavours good and bad, everywhere! Good and bad I hear you say? YES, submissive, abusive, animalistic, outre fetish, downright illegal happenings.........that is all freely available and perhaps ought not to be.........
Not all of the above 'excessive' stuff is practiced beahind closed doors by 16 year olds, and my view is that at the early ages, experimentation is what cana, just possibly can, lead to juvinile attitudes towards sexual relationships .....which are not always well adjusted attitude.
I am not against porn, I'm against the pervasive and all encompassing availability of all its forms..........but its just an opinion |
|
JK2006 |
Looks like anyone under 18 will be banned from watching Porn online. Isn't it peculiar that they are legally allowed to fuck like rabbits at 16 but cannot watch others doing it for two more years? I'm sure the Mail has a good reason for this (probably ban everyone from sex until 18) but I can't quite understand Government justification. |
|
|
|
