cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Still no verdict on Waxie Maxie
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
steveimp Is Tony Hancock on the jury?
In The Know I would guess that they are clearly split on "some" charges, but maybe not all?

If something was clear-cut (either way) it would be fairly obvious to all fairly quickly.

Maybe they have decided on most of the charges but there are one or two that are not "that straight forward" ?

Does that make sense?
JK2006 Seventh day - my jury took about 3 days to decide my verdict - (wrongly) guilty on 6 charges.
Waxie is facing 11 charges - so twice as long makes sense.
My trial was only 4 days long before the jury were sent out though.
Maxie's took weeks.
In The Know Thanks, Giles

Surely, if one Juror knew one of the witnesses this should have been sorted out at the selection of the Jury?
giles2008 m.huffpost.com/uk/entry/5165927

Two jurors discharged. Surely should have been replaced??
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2025 King of Hits.co.uk