cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Robert Hughes appeal
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 Yes called "similar evidence" in UK law, Hedda. Iniquitous. In my case the "similarities" included how I met people, how I played them all music and asked them all about music, and any "details" the "victims" happened to remember whilst being interviewed (coached) by the same police officers. I gather that's been changed since my trial 14 years ago. But when it came to the "acts" themselves (all imaginary) they were all totally different. Odd that.
hedda www.theage.com.au/national/accused-damne...-20140531-39b4r.html

Damning evidence of ingrained predatory behaviour - or unfair character assassination? That's the heart of the contentious legal strategy of introducing evidence of a pattern of incidents, or ''signature'' bad behaviour, that has been a feature of both the recent prosecution of Robert Hughes in Australia and the Rolf Harris trial in Britain, both on child sex offences.
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2025 King of Hits.co.uk