Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Online posts (forums etc) can cause a mistrial?
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
hedda |
well don't keep us in suspense...who is on trial? |
|
John Marsh |
I wonder if Vanessa George tried to use that excuse?
And others..... Not heard of this person until now.
Well when I look up the new stories and available information on some these "real deal paedophile" people I notice two things. One I find it hard to believe that anyone would be that crazy but there are many that are (Never met any myself) and secondly when it is "the real deal", then real evidence seems to be very easy to find and convincing. No need for the false allegation crowd.
Also, I can understand the reason for the anger of people. Just wish they would take time to direct that anger at the guilty and not find any "old" target. It is strange. When different groups get down trodden and then riot they tear up their own neighbourhoods both in the UK, Paris and the US. Probably everywhere. We are certainly strange animals. Very childish neverthe less. |
|
facepalm |
Oh dear....
seems today the jury didnt hear about the video that has disgusted so many...
they heard about another one!! and its quite rightly knocked a lot of people sick.
Still,it was all about "gathering evidence" wasnt it? 
I wonder if Vanessa George tried to use that excuse?
Still she has some supporters left. Dr Nigel Oldfield (convicted child pornographer),Chris Spivey (awaiting indecent images charges) and Danille La Verite (who thinks everyone is a paedophile (exept her Facebook friends) oh and the David Icke forum lot...who think that EVERYTHING is staged by freemasons. |
|
hedda |
I'm amazed the things some nutters say on the net when they couldn't possibly have a clue about the truth.
Prince Andrew is an example at present.
There really should be a Criminal Law for Libel.
So sick of this ghastly US import of "freedom of speech" when it's hogwash. |
|
facepalm |
Thanks for the replies.
Said person (who must remain anonymous)has this past year threatened people online on an almost daily basis and claims that she has countless folk under investigation involving several police forces who are taking action and planing mass arrests etc (for defamation,slander,libel and trolling)
I just wonder how this will work if this person is found guilty though two weeks from now when their trial ends?
Also this person has publicly blamed the police and authorities of a mass cover-up and the only reason that this person was arrested and charged is cos they made the police look bad in the first place!
I know this is confussing but I cant say more incase im cyber arrested.But im sure you will work out who im referring too in a few days once the trial gets underway.
Is it slander to comment in a negative way about a person being intentionaly repulsive?
For instance if i write "you rotten filthy pigs!" under 2girls1cup can the two choco munchers take me court for it? 
Cos the person in question is threatening everyone with legal action over stuff they said in a disturbing video...which hopefully the judge will see for himself.
If the judge dislikes the video does that make him a troll? |
|
|
|
