Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Migrants stranded in boat
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
andrew |
In The Know (as always) wrote:
andrew wrote:
Dogs Trust got a lovely donation at Christmas from us
... you've given the dog away now ??? lol !
Don't give up your retirement to be a comedian.  |
|
andrew |
Pattaya wrote:
In The Know (as always) wrote:
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
JK2006 wrote:
Yes I've always hated "Charity begins at home". It doesn't. It's not charity. It's self interest and necessity. Charity is doing something for someone else and not getting anything in return - not even a better image or a glowing feeling of "being nice".
Oh I agree, but charity is not something that should be forced upon others. If they don't want to give that is ok.
Therefore..
If people object to "us" giving money to India when people are starving at home then it is a perfectly valid complaint.
(I think if the India money was stopped there is not a cats chance in hell of it doing good here instead so it makes no difference)
No one is "starving" at home, honey!
THEY ALL GET CASH !
Some choose to spend it on booze (or a new Samsung mobile) rather than buy food, honey!
Its a matter of choice.
I expect being stuck in Bakewell you have no knowledge of what happens elsewhere to the working classes.... 
I do wish that ITK listens to Pattaya more and I'm sure he could teach Mrs ITK a thing or two.  |
|
In The Know (as always) |
andrew wrote:
Dogs Trust got a lovely donation at Christmas from us
... you've given the dog away now ??? lol ! |
|
Pattaya |
In The Know (as always) wrote:
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
JK2006 wrote:
Yes I've always hated "Charity begins at home". It doesn't. It's not charity. It's self interest and necessity. Charity is doing something for someone else and not getting anything in return - not even a better image or a glowing feeling of "being nice".
Oh I agree, but charity is not something that should be forced upon others. If they don't want to give that is ok.
Therefore..
If people object to "us" giving money to India when people are starving at home then it is a perfectly valid complaint.
(I think if the India money was stopped there is not a cats chance in hell of it doing good here instead so it makes no difference)
No one is "starving" at home, honey!
THEY ALL GET CASH !
Some choose to spend it on booze (or a new Samsung mobile) rather than buy food, honey!
Its a matter of choice.
I expect being stuck in Bakewell you have no knowledge of what happens elsewhere to the working classes.... |
|
In The Know (as always) |
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
JK2006 wrote:
Yes I've always hated "Charity begins at home". It doesn't. It's not charity. It's self interest and necessity. Charity is doing something for someone else and not getting anything in return - not even a better image or a glowing feeling of "being nice".
Oh I agree, but charity is not something that should be forced upon others. If they don't want to give that is ok.
Therefore..
If people object to "us" giving money to India when people are starving at home then it is a perfectly valid complaint.
(I think if the India money was stopped there is not a cats chance in hell of it doing good here instead so it makes no difference)
No one is "starving" at home, honey!
THEY ALL GET CASH !
Some choose to spend it on booze (or a new Samsung mobile) rather than buy food, honey!
Its a matter of choice. |
|
|
|
