cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: JK Were you acquitted?
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
John Marsh www.theguardian.com/uk/2001/nov/21/childprotection.society

There is a little info here. But as per usual minimal.
JK2006 I urge you to read my autobiography - 65 My Life So Far and the second volume 70 FFFY but, in a nutshell; yes but not on appeal (that's still pending, believe it or not). The Judge decided to split the false allegations into several trials. I was convicted in the first but acquitted on all charges in the second so the Judge ordered the prosecution to abandon all the other claims and said that his sentence would reflect all allegations. I considered this very unfair - why wasn't the verdict in the second trial considered the representative one? So I'm still appealing the first trial verdict.

Wikipedia gets so many facts wrong. It is, after all, edited by people with no access to detail. Instead of transcripts they go by tabloid coverage, and, as we know, tabloids and all media frequently get details wrong, often intentionally if it makes a better story.
Bennie I read somewhere that you were acquitted. Was this your appeal? I tried Wikipedia but can't understand their section on your conviction.