King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Cannabis and false allegations
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
JK2006	Agreed Angel; the vast majority of those who use hash, marijuana, cannabis are fine - just as the majority of alcohol drinkers - and most smokers of tobacco don't get cancer (my Mum a prime example) but the fact remains that some do suffer effects and one of my false accusers was actually a diagnosed schizophrenic (his claims were dropped by the judge). Not all drug users are fantasists and not all accusers are false. But there is a connection there that should be made.
Angel	I believe the latest news on Marijuana not cannabis is misleading. You would have to be a serious user who constantly smokes super skunk (laced with nasty chemicals) to have some from of psychosis. The majority of users are sensible social smokers who purposely avoid super skunk but then, thats not a good story is it?
JK2006	My lawyer said the judge would say just because the "victim" had charges dropped would not mean he was lying about this. Which is correct. I would argue that - in a fair system - he should also have pointed out that it might imply the "victim" was inspired to either exaggerate or invent claims in order to avoid prosecution. As we have since discovered (Bob Woffinden's investigation as detailed in 65 My Life So Far).
frodo	can that be true jk? how on earth did the judge not tell the jury to acquit?
JK2006	The jurors in my first trial were not impressed by this evidence; I assume they thought nobody ever lies, not even drug addicts. Likewise, the evidence that my main accuser had been "let off" very serious charges of being the getaway driver on a St Neots jeweller smash and grab raid, when he agreed to testify against me, was clearly of no interest to the jurors. They must have felt such a deal by police had no bearing at all on his evidence, because "you will be believed". And such police behaviour was quite acceptable when catching such a Vile Pervert as my good self.