IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Topic History of: And the alleged rapist was ? Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author
Message
hedda
I feel these 2 are reveling in how easy it is to get publicity which can be like a drug to some people but are incredibly naive as to how the Media Beast can come back and bite ferociously.
As for the MP husband, someone somewhere commented that he's like Labour's very own Geoffrey Dickens. I imagine party bosses must flinch at his comments.
## The Mail is very odd. They don't seem to like any political party (I'm with them on that one)
JK2006
The Mail today really begins to cast doubts on the false accuser's testimony (assuming her brother is innocent unless proven guilty). I'm waiting for the obvious next stage; her dear husband Labour MP (the Mail doesn't like Labour) and pending allegations of some kind from the first wife and possibly the children.
To simplify, the Mail is suggesting that some of Karen's accusations may not be entirely accurate. Something not previously admitted by mainstream media about any false accusers (even those sent to prison for perverting the course of justice). The subtext is - if people are mistaken (I'm being polite here), other people may be mistaken too (such as the first wife discussing Simon's domestic behaviour). And if some people are mistaken or deluded, that could affect certain other allegations. Can of worms.