cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Mark Williams Thomas talking a lot of sense on BBC News
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Jo He tweets "child sex abuse coverups" not child sex abuse "cover-ups" twitter.com/mwilliamsthomas/status/577794449381711872
www.bbc.com/news/uk-31907201

Perhaps they should ask him the next time if he thinks there's a risk that Twitter could be used to suggest ideas to people. The idea of a coverup could explain away a lot of things, like there being no record of you allegedly reporting something you've only just thought of.
hedda how would he know? all gossip and rumour
jumps on bandwagons as they career along.
JK2006 I have to say I agreed with most of what he said except - he never touched on the possibility that people get things slightly wrong, memories alter facts, media promotes "good stories" which can exaggerate and expand non stories into great stories. And failed to cover (why should he?) the exploding industry behind these stories. There's a lot of money to be made (by some people) out of child abuse, rape, historical allegations and media exposees.

He mainly blamed corrupt police for past scandals. Nobody seems to think most police in the past were decent people trying to do an honest job. And they whittled out obviously false allegations as well as going along with superiors who perhaps decided the lesser evil was to drop silly charges against people technically breaking unfair laws.

Now those police may have made mistakes. They may not have found evidence of child abuse in a welter of consensual young male sex (often including the "victimless" crime of prostitution - we used to call them Hustlers in those days - check out Midnight Cowboy). So we certainly do NOT assume or claim there was no child abuse. We simply suspect there are now exaggerations, fuelled, of course, by the essential dominant ingredient from the media - A GREAT STORY.