cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Further corruption in our broken system
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
John Marsh First noticed forsenic (scientific testing) questionable results when reading up on the Amanda Knox case. A number of worrying events happened in relation to the follow up, DNA testing after finding a wild card suspect from the prosecutor's newly minted story that he needed the facts to corroborate. He was also noted been in close promity to the noted technician. Just an advanced form of doctoring police notes from an interview that the UK is very familar with.

I hope that normal practice is for technicians to test by unidentified numbers to prevent the temptation to assist the evidence. Thus they find such and such a result for item id such and such.
JK2006 Looks like 6000 possibly deliberately faulty drug tests. How many innocent people are in jail? How many guilty people are free in the community? It really beggars belief.

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-39860639
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2024 King of Hits.co.uk