cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Police Tricks 13...
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 And just had lunch with Julie - one of my Angelettes from the early 1970's. I was so grateful and appreciative of the many prepared to bear witness in Court that the lies against me could not be believed. It is not easy to prove one's innocence.

www.kingofhits.co.uk/component/option,co...d,64/?g2_itemId=6883
Jo How very interesting. I hope this all works in your favour, JK, and your appeal is successful.
JK2006 Again; well spotted - no it is NOT independent and the police tend to be inaccurate and often dishonest. In 2000, for the first time ever, after the "raid" my credit card was used in Paris and £30,000 attempted to be charged on it (and refused). In 2015 Deniz Corday's TV recorder "caught fire" accidentally when being examined. Fortunately it gave Surrey Police an excuse to pay him £100 in used ten pound notes (at the same time as asking him whether he might be prepared to give evidence against me, which he naturally refused to do but told me he suspected a link between the two events).

Police behaviour in Great Britain often appears to cross the legality line.
honey!oh sugar sugar. When it was all being listed, was this done by somebody independent of you and the police?
How do we know you have got it all back?
JK2006 Well spotted Honey; yes; originally it was because I was still pursuing my appeal (I still am); then, crucially, when the publicity provoked by my 2015 arrest failed to provoke enough false allegations, Surrey Police decided they had to revive previously rejected or "lie on file" 2000 claims and so had to re-examine all the stuff stolen by them from me in 2000/2001. Big mistake, it proved; the words "can of worms" spring to mind. All of a sudden, dodgy past cop behaviour got exposed and examined. And is still being - assisting my CCRC appeal.