cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Absolutely brilliant.
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 Well worth keeping up as this develops.
JK2006 And this is fascinating...

rabbitaway.blogspot.com/2019/04/operatio...williams-thomas.html
hedda trollexposure wrote:
Thank you all for your very kind comments regarding the articles on trollexposure.

There were additional articles to those posted by JK which filled in some more holes and also strengthened some of the initial theories in the first article in that series.


This link is highlighted in the most recent of those articles: web.archive.org/web/20121203161911/http:...ark-williams-thomas/
It raises some more concerns about that NotW 2001 list and it's real source. It also raises questions about who the "woman in the media" was who initially introduced MWT to the concept of JK's alleged offending. Could it be that the "woman in the media" was Rebekah Brooks or indeed someone like Shy Keenan?


I must say you are doing some great forensic stuff there.

Time and events move quickly (I bet MWT is pleased about that) and it's difficult at times, to get into the nitty gritty of events such as the King judgement. It helps to read a full judgement but many of us don't have the time or inclination to.

So it's always good when someone else can do this and highlight important facts as you have done.
trollexposure Thanks JK. It was just a thought re Brooks because of the previous connection in NotW. Thank you for the promotions too on your Twitter feed.

If I may also take the opportunity to make a shameless plug, and in promotional parlance here's my latest "album" (!)

For those who haven't already read it (and apologies if you have), that latest article is about the ruling made by the judge, Justice Deborah Taylor, regarding JK's 2018 acquittal and the issues that surrounded that acquittal. The ruling document is damning of serial failures by Surrey Police in particular, it also raises some additional questions in my view regarding MWT's involvement with Operation Yewtree which were not part of the explicit ruling but should be considered by both the Met and Surrey Police in the aftermath of the ruling.
JK2006 Ah no TE - you have to remember I have access to loads of information - much of which I either cannot share (unused during my recent debacle) or choose to keep to myself for the moment. The woman was neither of those and has recently deceased but left a great deal of information behind which we (and crucial others) now possess.