Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Carl Beech Guilty
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
Jo |
Stormzy Daniels wrote:
This clown is just one of many who claim such stuff.Youtube is filled with folk who are "survivors of satanic ritual abuse"
I find folk who lie about being sexually abused the absolute worst.
Being molested as a child is bad enough...so why folk feel the need to exagerate it or just make it up from scratch for attention disgusts me.
Ive not looked but I expect there are a ton of Youtubers who have been "injected with cancer" by freemasons and illuminati at some satanic celebrity gathering aswell..complete with shaven head pics as "total proof it happened"
Moor Larkin said it well (in a comment under a blogpost):
"It's fairly clear that the "Activists" are mostly petty criminals and ex-alcoholics or hop-heads. The head honchoes that are visible all have well-dodgy CV's and appear to vary their stories as they go along. They also never have real contemporaries to add balance or credence to their versions of events. You have to believe them - end of discussion. If you don't they fly into wild temper tantrums.
They flew into a rage when David Rose got the Mail to re-expose Steven Messham, although why Messham needed to be exposed yet again is baffling. Rose referred to it as Institutional Amnesia I think. I would see it more as conniving sensationalist journalism, political agendas and pure commercial greed by a pack of lying liars and sex fantasists. I'm sure a lot of them get their jollies describing all this sex stuff."
jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.com/2015/01/wh...be.html?view=classic
Those last sentences must surely have applied to Carl Beech, as his earlier convictions suggest, and probably to a lot of others who make false claims and/or set themselves up as "paedo hunters". Perhaps even some enablers fall into the same category. |
|
Randall |
Sheba Bear wrote:
Yet the Mail sees fit to perpetuate the myth for which there was no evidence other than people (in line for compo) saying that it had happened.
The Mail also misses the howlingly obvious logical next step... Which is that almost all current prosecutions of living men who actually get imprisoned for years are on the same basis.
Stormzy Daniels wrote:
I expect there are a ton of Youtubers who have been "injected with cancer" by freemasons and illuminati at some satanic celebrity gathering aswell
Don't forget people abducted by aliens (and often sexually abused by them too, possibly satanically). The majority of the activity of the British criminal justice apparatus is now conducted at this standard. |
|
Stormzy Daniels |
This clown is just one of many who claim such stuff.Youtube is filled with folk who are "survivors of satanic ritual abuse"
I find folk who lie about being sexually abused the absolute worst.
Being molested as a child is bad enough...so why folk feel the need to exagerate it or just make it up from scratch for attention disgusts me.
Ive not looked but I expect there are a ton of Youtubers who have been "injected with cancer" by freemasons and illuminati at some satanic celebrity gathering aswell..complete with shaven head pics as "total proof it happened" |
|
Sheba Bear |
Big fail from the Mail:
Beech ruthlessly exploited the hysteria of the post-Savile era when the country was gripped by collective guilt over the institutional failings that allowed the now notorious DJ to abuse at will.
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7274151...-lies-son-VICAR.html
Savile was never convicted of any sexual crimes,as we all know,and is innocent in the eyes of the law. Yet the Mail sees fit to perpetuate the myth for which there was no evidence other than people (in line for compo) saying that it had happened.
My guess is that as an unmarried man he took advantage of girls who threw themselves at him. As any man would. At least back then.  |
|
honey!oh sugar sugar. |
Carl Beech is just one peculiar man though. The real criminals, in my view, are the ones who aided and abetted him. |
|
|
|
