IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Yes they will say it is to protect possible "victims" from being identified. In these days of the Internet everybody knows anyway.
Randall
Having seen the full report, are you able to say why several chapters haven't been published?
Bookworm
Interesting. I seen a tweet by @CPS recently which said they can and do have ways of prosecuting without complaints.
Note how it is still a sometimes impossible task to get officials prosecuted appropriately? The times I've made complaints and it has been suggested I was being malicious. When they want the truth they are just doing their job, when we want the truth we are causing trouble. That response alone wreaks of them being scared.
I'll give them a hard time for the rest of their days.
Pure filth.
JK2006
Back in 2016 I read the Henriques Report (unredacted thanks to contacts), spotted the numerous reflections in my investigations (shocking, even, possibly, criminal police behaviour) and complained to slimy Surrey CC Ephgrave and PCC Munro. Police lying to Judges; police not reporting Deaths In Custody to the independent watchdog; police arresting and questioning "suspects" when no complaint had been made; police threatening "victims" unless they pretended to have been abused; police using rape suspects as "witnesses" and CPS avoiding calling rape victims as "witnesses" in case they threw doubt on "victims" credibility; police not finding witnesses to prove liars claims false...
Lynne Owens was Surrey Police Chief Constable in 2015 (authorising illegal arrests) and Ephgrave had been her Deputy.