cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Jeremy Bamber
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
hedda without a doubt Bamber was unfairly tried and the media helped in painting him as the villain.

The fact relatives aided after the initial investigation..discovering "evidence" the police didn't is highly suspect especially when they financially benefited.

I however don't know whether he is guilty or not.

It's another example of why police have to be honest and thorough but for decades now they have told so many lies about people and gained so many convictions of the innocent, now the vast general public think they are corrupt.

Sounds like MWT is hitching himself to a wagon that's now gathering pace.

# remember he claimed Oscar Pitorious was innocent as the judge sent him down.
Bookworm Books, sources and opinions say many things. Rarely any convincing proof.
Moi, goes more in-depth.

@Barney Forget conspiracy nonsense.

My Book/Blog is picking up interest quite nicely.

Thanks for making your mind up before you've read it.
Ignorance helps nobody.
Wait until you have a problem!
Barney But you are enable to say why that might be - or to express your own view as to what happened?


Green Man I have read hundreds of true crime books over the years. I say about 5% of them say Bamber is innocent.
Barney Bookworm wrote:
the main furore seems to be around the phone calls made to the police from Jeremy and his father Neville

No - the 'main furore' and the one which makes this case virtually unique: The destruction of crime site evidence by the investigators (police) themselves.

Albeit erroneously.


Several new phone calls were uncovered since the trial, and ignored.

Notably the one from Jeremy to the police - later on the night in question - which raises many issues.

Logging thereof was conspicuous by its absence.


This case needs reappraisal. Even the senior officer in charge (who retired soon after) was barely on the farm - having concluded that the perpetrator was the unwell daughter.

Because the case was so clear, as to what happened - the Essex police helped Jeremy Bamber to wash the farmhouse!



(forget about your blog/book)