King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Harvey Weinstein - the ugly truth.
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Randall	Honey wrote: I think the problem is that there doesn't seem to be much firm evidence required for a conviction. It is horrible horrible horrible that sex offenders can get away with it simply because it happens with no witnesses usually, but just as vile that innocent people can easily be convicted BECAUSE of the relaxed standard for evidence. I have no idea if Harvey Weinstein is a rapist or just a creep. I don't know if the girls were victims or chancers, because the procedure is too vague for me to be able to accept the verdict. I think Honey nails it here.
Honey	Barney wrote: So Honey, at what age would you allow OAPs - convicted of very serious crimes (rape, murder, treason etc.) off - scott free? People age at different rates and have different health challenges. A hundred years old would be a waste of time though, don't you think?
Barney	So Honey, at what age would you allow OAPs - convicted of very serious crimes (rape, murder, treason etc.) off - scott free?
Honey	tdf wrote: Incidentally, JK, I would agree about Hitchcock. If, by some freak of genetics or nature, he was still alive today, he'd either be in the middle of various trials, or in prison. There is a case in England recently where a 100 year old was convicted of historic sex crimes. I dont like the idea of very elderly people being convicted of ancient crimes because it can only be about punishment not rehabilitation. And of course, they might have already rehabilitated themselves.
tdf	Incidentally, JK, I would agree about Hitchcock. If, by some freak of genetics or nature, he was still alive today, he'd either be in the middle of various trials, or in prison. There is a case in England recently where a 100 year old was convicted of historic sex crimes.