cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Aviation Injustice
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Barney For the first time, Ryanair will lose £100 million in the quarter to June 2021 - and it plans to mothball 99% of aircraft, for some months.

In addition, it's significantly reduced staffing levels - whilst negotiating reductions, with Boeing, on order numbers. Ticket refunds have also been delayed.

Strong action by an airline with a strong balance sheet - including liquidity and reserves available to combat the downturn in the aviation industry.


Unfairly - and seemingly, illegally - weaker European airlines (without the resources to fight the difficulties) are resorting to hoovering up state aid, from a variety of countries.

Lufthansa, KLM, Air France, SAS and others are - by accepting this assistance - gaining an unfair advantage over their stronger competitors. Such as Ryanair - and EasyJet.

Propping up measures will soon amount to over £30 billion - with nothing whatsoever for the economically viable airlines. And perhaps, the biggest example is corporate nepotism in aviation history.


Ryanair are about to commence legal action in the European courts - for compensation in respect of the aid.

As it flaunts a plethora of fairplay agreements, regulations and legislations.


Good luck to them!

Why should successful trailblazers be disadvantaged for their success?