cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Craig McLachlan not guilty
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Honey I see there was no massive headlines telling of his innocence, like when he was accused.
Wyot I know it has already been touched on here but it is not on that the Magistrate said the verdict "may have been different" if current definitions of consent had been applied. This will simply be read as "he done it..." by 99% of people.

He faced no trial against the current definition, so she should cast no opinion.

Shame on the Magistrate for doing so when it was none of her business to comment.
JK2006 You're right BB but even worse are the POLICE enablers. When they actively try to assist false accusers. That can be lethal.
BB I think the thing this case illustrates most is the greed of lawyers who help bring such claims to court and I’m really pleased it was thrown out. In my opinion the big contributing factor that would have led to a dismissal is that the alleged acts all happened so publicly and in circumstances were it could never be assumed the accused had a motive of performing any more intimate sexual activity.
JK2006 If Chris Evans (the DJ) has been following this, I bet he has been very nervous.