King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: One Million Vaccinations
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Wyot	Rick wrote: This coverage just HAS to start including the public on its list of significant and culpable actors. Aside from your personal perception Rick, can you point to evidence of a systematic breaking of restrictions by a majority - or even significant minority - of people in the UK?
Rick	And so it goes on: in the press conference this afternoon, idiots like Robert Peston asking for guarantees that this target will be met and this aim will be achieved, etc etc - any sane person understands that all of this depends to a great extent on public compliance, and no scientist or politician can 'guarantee' that unless they opt for martial law. You may as well ask a journalist if his newspaper can meet its sales targets - it doesn't entirely depend on them! This coverage just HAS to start including the public on its list of significant and culpable actors.
Honey	Baroness Boothroyd on the vaccine. twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1346163973683556353
Honey	Alison wrote: Honey wrote: giving people a medical treatment they haven't consented to? Vaccination is voluntary. But strongly recommended. No. They (sensibly) agreed to have the first part now and the second part three weeks later. They agreed to a treatment that would leave them fully protected. The manufacturers say there is no evidence of protection after three weeks. Now, it may or may not be the best thing for these people to be left with either less or no protection and end up as unwilling volunteers in an experiment they did not choose. It might well work out ok, but that isn't the point. It is not ethical. Matt Hancock (or possibly the manufacturers) has lied about the efficacy. They cant BOTH be telling the truth. It stinks. When we take away the right to properly consent to medical treatment, we are in trouble.
Alison	Honey wrote: giving people a medical treatment they haven't consented to? Vaccination is voluntary. But strongly recommended.