IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Keir Starmer UGH
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
Green Man |
Honey wrote:
robbiex wrote:
I think that Starmer would stand a better chance of against Sunak than Boris. Remember the red wall voters voted for Boris not for the tories. They probably hate traditional tories, which is what Sunak is. only concerned about the GDP and helping big business. Also I don't think that a lot of people would accept an asian as the British Prime Minister.
As for the Reform party, this is basically tory light. A new party can never make an impact on the electorate, as the Greens and UKIP have shown, 2 mps between them, and the ukip was a tory that changed parties.
I don't think Indian people suffer the same discrimination as others, do they?
No, they are normally praised and accepted because they normally the highest earners in jobs and savvy businessman/women. Many Asians own corner shops because you can make an annual fortune. |
|
Honey |
robbiex wrote:
I think that Starmer would stand a better chance of against Sunak than Boris. Remember the red wall voters voted for Boris not for the tories. They probably hate traditional tories, which is what Sunak is. only concerned about the GDP and helping big business. Also I don't think that a lot of people would accept an asian as the British Prime Minister.
As for the Reform party, this is basically tory light. A new party can never make an impact on the electorate, as the Greens and UKIP have shown, 2 mps between them, and the ukip was a tory that changed parties.
I don't think Indian people suffer the same discrimination as others, do they? |
|
Green Man |
robbiex wrote:
I think that Starmer would stand a better chance of against Sunak than Boris. Remember the red wall voters voted for Boris not for the tories. They probably hate traditional tories, which is what Sunak is. only concerned about the GDP and helping big business. Also I don't think that a lot of people would accept an asian as the British Prime Minister.
As for the Reform party, this is basically tory light. A new party can never make an impact on the electorate, as the Greens and UKIP have shown, 2 mps between them, and the ukip was a tory that changed parties.
People voted to get Brexit done. Mrs May didn't trigger it, Boris did but he has been a disaster ever since.
I have no problem with Conservative government, I have lived in USA during the Reagan, George Bush and George Bush Jr era's. I have also lived in Canada which is very Liberal. It was nothing like it is now a shit show. |
|
robbiex |
I think that Starmer would stand a better chance of against Sunak than Boris. Remember the red wall voters voted for Boris not for the tories. They probably hate traditional tories, which is what Sunak is. only concerned about the GDP and helping big business. Also I don't think that a lot of people would accept an asian as the British Prime Minister.
As for the Reform party, this is basically tory light. A new party can never make an impact on the electorate, as the Greens and UKIP have shown, 2 mps between them, and the ukip was a tory that changed parties. |
|
Green Man |
Rick wrote:
It's a difficult job being the official Opposition party, but you really have to avoid two things if you want to seem responsible and authentic:
1. Don't just keep using hindsight to say what you wouldn't have done;
2. Don't just keep saying 'we'd have done the same thing but done more of it and sooner'.
And sadly all that Starmer does is those two things. It's lazy, it's cynical, it's cowardly and it's utterly unconvincing as a vote winner to all but the party faithful.
Also he does not challenge Boris.
A real opposition would demand no lockdowns, no Covid passports, no pushing on vaccines but have them if people want them, no mandates and no masks to be a legal requirement. |
|
|
|
|
