King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: the more I look..the more I'm convinced..
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
md	You’d think that the DM, with their heavy picture content and regular ‘Spot the Panda’ feature would recognise a fake instantly.
Jo	Thank you, hedda, but it's the people who originally spotted these things who deserve the credit! hedda wrote: There is a photo I can't find..of Andrew and accuser edited out of the pic with just Maxwell which suddenly looks very real 7 like an original pic but especially the straight lines of a door frame..covered in the Andrew pic..which my photographer pal tells me is the most difficult thing to edit..a straight line. There's a photo fitting that description here Prince Andrew's ex Lady Victoria Hervey calls Virginia Giuffre a 'scam artist' who 'settled very fast' as she shares another strangely edited version of THAT notorious photo with the Duke showing Ghislaine Maxwell alone (and here 'Nothing adds up at all!' Now Prince Andrew's ex Lady Victoria Hervey claims photos of Virginia Giuffre at Naomi Campbell's birthday party could ALSO be faked in latest bizarre rant). But in the photo of Maxwell alone the right-hand line (her right) of her jumper looks strange to me, as if it has been badly edited, and I've seen comments pointing out that her right hand has disappeared, as has the picture on the wall. Strangely, there's a door frame in the photo with Maxwell alone whereas only a bit of door frame is visible at the bottom right in the photo with all three of them. Could that be the "photograph of a photograph of a photograph" effect?
hedda	well spotted Jo..you're a bloody good investigator. I couldn't bring myself to read Churcher's piece as she basically schooled the accuser into claiming famous names and mentioned Alan Dershowitz who Giuffre said she didn't know. There is a photo I can't find..of Andrew and accuser edited out of the pic with just Maxwell which suddenly looks very real 7 like an original pic but especially the straight lines of a door frame..covered in the Andrew pic..which my photographer pal tells me is the most difficult thing to edit..a straight line. He regulatory air-brushes & photo-shops pics for magazines like Vogue and like me is convinced it's a good, but not good enough photo shopped pic. Personally..I reckon there is a long game being played here and believe the accuser will fall at some stage. I repeat again about my pal who was Charles valet for many years but was fired when he married Diana for being snapped a couple of times too drunk...and was the very first to sell an inside Royal's tale in the USA for $1M and regretted it within months. It brought him nothing but grief as he claimed "I crossed the most powerful establishment & Secret Services in the world..not the Royals but those behind them. They are unforgiving and treat revenge as a dish best served cold..my life is a living hell& they will have their revenge". He swears it's why he got the cancer which killed him.
md	There is one other exception. i.ytimg.com/vi/Ke8t1hWqUKY/hqdefault.jpg image.shutterstock.com/image-photo/pinoc...-260nw-400886851.jpg
Honey	You just don't dress like that if you are going to dance in tramps and have it off with a prince. And you most certainly don't pay girls huge amounts of money to be prostitutes and have them turn up in jeans, scruffy top, and no make up or hair-do.