IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Prince Andrew settlement
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
hedda |
Jo wrote:
Things certainly seem to be going her way rather than Prince Andrew's at the moment.
Exclusive: Prince Andrew agrees not to repeat his denial that he raped Virginia Giuffre
Prince Andrew 'can never again deny he raped Virginia Giuffre', reports say
PRINCE Andrew can never repeat his denial that he raped Virginia Giuffre when she was a minor, according to reports.
The settlement the two have reached bringing an end to the civil lawsuit against the Duke also barrs him from ever claiming he had never met Giuffre, according to The Telegraph.
A gagging clause also means neither side can discuss the financial settlement, which reportedly stands at £12 million – £10m for Giuffre and £2m for her sex-trafficking charity.
However, Giuffre’s silence on the case is reportedly only temporary, supposedly only lasting as long as the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee.
don't believe that claim. |
|
Jo |
I've just had a quick look at Virginia Giuffre's Twitter page and it says at the top "Founder of Speak Out, Act, Reclaim (SOAR) non-profit aimed at educating & advocating for victims of trafficking" with a link to a website www.speakoutactreclaim.org/
It says the following on the "About" part of the website:
SOAR (formerly Victims Refuse Silence) incorporated as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization in 2015. But the work truly took shape when founder Virginia Giuffre underwent her own personal transformation from victim to survivor.
Giuffre is perhaps the most prominent survivor of Jeffrey Epstein's crimes, but he was not her first abuser. By the time she met Epstein, when she was 16, Giuffre had already been sexually trafficked by another man. It would take her more than two years to escape Epstein after meeting her now husband, Robert.
Upon becoming a mother, Giuffre resolved to take action, reclaiming her own story so that subsequent generations would not have to endure what she had. Giuffre has relentlessly named and testified against her abusers, engaged with media, and served as an advocate for anti-trafficking measures. Her candor and determination have inspired survivors from across the globe to share their own stories and seek support.
Speak Out, Act, Reclaim (SOAR) officially launched in November of 2021. At this early stage, we are not yet accepting donations. |
|
Honey |
Aha! Now Victoria Roberts is being sued herself, her payout cant be touched, seen as it is safely in the "charity" 
No flies on this girl!  |
|
Wyot |
Oh the grand old Duke of York, he found £12 million quid, then gave it away to a woman, against whom nothing he did.... |
|
Honey |
Jo wrote:
Honey wrote:
It wouldn't surprise me if her "charity", like Archewell Foundation, is registered in Delaware?
Found this:
Prince Andrew to donate ‘substantial’ sum to Virginia Giuffre’s victims’ rights charity
Ms Giuffre, now 38, created Victims Refuse Silence, a non-profit based in Fort Lauderdale in the US in 2015.
It ‘aims to change the landscape of the war on sexual abuse and human trafficking’ and help survivors ‘break the silence associated with sexual abuse.’
The group has not been active recently – its website domain name has lapsed and it last posted on Facebook in August 2020.
I can't find the charity website (just the Facebook page www.facebook.com/victimsrefusesilence/), maybe because the domain name has lapsed, but found the "charity navigator" site below, showing that it's based in Fort Lauderdale. Mission "Not available", URL "Not available" and not scored for financial accountability ("This organization cannot be evaluated by our Encompass Rating methodology because it files Form 990-N, as allowed by the IRS for charities with less than $50,000 annual revenue. - Note: The absence of a score does not indicate a positive or negative assessment, it only indicates that we have not yet evaluated this organization.")
www.charitynavigator.org/ein/472627774
Perhaps it's more for show than anything else, to bolster her victim status.
Oh how interesting. I wonder if registering it there is the same as Delaware, where you can take ninety-five percent of the charity money.
I'd have thought it easier to do it in Australia, unless there is a good reason? |
|
|
|
|
