cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: NATO in Ukraine
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Laura5 The 'don't shoot to kill policy' wouldn't be known to Russian soldiers (if it was, it wouldn't be believed), and the loss of life, inevitable. Countries have invoked and endorsed Trump's view that US military personnel must not be put at risk to solve the problems of other regions. No more Vietnam's etc. Hence, support is available only in the forms of rhetoric, hardware and financial ostracisation. From drones to tanks, and unprecedented economic embargoes.
JK2006 I actually feel that each NATO country should put 20,000 PEACEKEEPERS into Ukraine - that would be around 600,000 people, all instructed do NOT shoot to kill. But to push Russian troops out.
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2025 King of Hits.co.uk