Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: More fresh evidence of my innocence
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
JK2006 |
I'm certain they WERE found and not a soul said he'd mentioned me. Why would he have done? He'd never met me (I have a witness statement that he begged several people to introduce him to me after Johnny Reggae). |
|
Honey |
JK2006 wrote:
Exactly BB and if you look closely at this recently revealed report, half a dozen (or more) WOULD have still been open and with existing records in 2001. I'm certain Surrey Police did approach them all, did find detailed records, did see that I was never mentioned in any of them and not only failed to disclose that to our defence but destroyed all evidence of that before the trial. More and more DELIBERATE failures to disclose are emerging - a lot thanks to the 2015-2018 investigation which accidentally revealed just how badly - and dishonestly - the 2001 investigation was handled.
Apart from the official records though, individual workers would have their own notes or memories, if anybody bothered to ask them. |
|
Green Man |
JK2006 wrote:
Can you believe it - this thread has had 4500 more views than the Robert Maxwell one. He'd be furious!
But it illustrates - more and more people are still being affected by the False Allegations Industry; often by total liars; sometimes by criminals; sometimes by the genuinely confused (often through fake or exaggerated media coverage) but, for me, worst of all by ENABLERS; those who know the truth yet continue goading and encouraging. Cunning, clever lawyers or police with much to gain (99% financially). Example - Max Clifford; the man who pushed Kirk McIntyre into adding my name to his claims because then they would be worth something.
It's funny how Max Clifford snufffed it in prison, whilst you survived it.
I wonder if Max pissed anyone else off ? |
|
JK2006 |
Can you believe it - this thread has had 4500 more views than the Robert Maxwell one. He'd be furious!
But it illustrates - more and more people are still being affected by the False Allegations Industry; often by total liars; sometimes by criminals; sometimes by the genuinely confused (often through fake or exaggerated media coverage) but, for me, worst of all by ENABLERS; those who know the truth yet continue goading and encouraging. Cunning, clever lawyers or police with much to gain (99% financially). Example - Max Clifford; the man who pushed Kirk McIntyre into adding my name to his claims because then they would be worth something. |
|
hedda |
JK2006 wrote:
Exactly BB and if you look closely at this recently revealed report, half a dozen (or more) WOULD have still been open and with existing records in 2001. I'm certain Surrey Police did approach them all, did find detailed records, did see that I was never mentioned in any of them and not only failed to disclose that to our defence but destroyed all evidence of that before the trial. More and more DELIBERATE failures to disclose are emerging - a lot thanks to the 2015-2018 investigation which accidentally revealed just how badly - and dishonestly - the 2001 investigation was handled.
again similarly some Pell accusers had lengthy criminal records and had been in and out of psychiatric units.
Victorian Police weeded out the ones who would have made bad witnesses and promoted the clever ones who had lying down to a fine art.
2 accusers accused Pell with great synchronicity as the Archbishop in full regalia with a choir of raping them on an altar in front of packed congregation.
They didn't make it as potential police witnesses as Pell had been a lowly trainee priest at the time who had never taken a service. |
|
|
|
