cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: General Mike Jackson calls US policy in Iraq "intellectually bankrupt"
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
In The Know Solihull Exile wrote:
but we'll all be bankrupt if the price of fuel increases even furthur:angry:

I'm personally in favour of petrol prices being TRIPLED !

All those fatties will live longer - and so will the planet !
Solihull Exile I first went to Iraq in 2004.
Don't know about the 'intellectually bankrupt' part,but we'll all be bankrupt if the price of fuel increases even furthur:angry:
In The Know Needs no further comment, does it?

(Except, perhaps, to say that they fled in the dead of night?)

In The Know ... and what has been achieved (apart from one million dead) ?



British influence in the area is perhaps at its lowest level ever - hardly helping to "secure" oil supplies (the original reason for the invasion) is it?
In The Know Second UK officer attacks US policy -

(From BBC News) - <<< A second key British general has criticised US post-war policy in Iraq.
Maj Gen Tim Cross, who was the most senior UK officer involved in post-war planning, told the Sunday Mirror US policy was "fatally flawed".

His comments came after Gen Sir Mike Jackson, head of the Army during the invasion, told the Daily Telegraph US policy was "intellectually bankrupt".

John Bolton, former US ambassador to the UN, dismissed Sir Mike's criticism as "way off the mark". >>>

If these people genuinely believed this - WHY did they stay silent for so long?