cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Fascinating legal precedent
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 Yes I suspect he claims (and indeed it may be true) that it was simply an oversight on his part - a mistake - and nothing was intentional. Many police "bending the rules" do so in the genuine certainty that their victim is a criminal - a murderer or terrorist or, worst of all, someone who had consensual sex with another willing person of the same gender.

Hard to prove otherwise; just as it should be hard to prove guilt of someone claimed to have abused someone. That's why the law was changed making one person's word enough evidence to convict. Which, however well intended, opened the door to abuse.
Jo A fine and suspension for a year seems pretty lenient.

Here he is: www.4kbw.co.uk/members/timothy-raggatt-qc/
JK2006 It really is time that lazy or bent lawyers were prosecuted for attempting to pervert the course of justice. Often in tandem with police or CPS - deliberately trying to break the law.

www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/top-criminal-s....YqDkzm_s_gc.twitter
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2024 King of Hits.co.uk