Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Maxine
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
Donald Biden |
In a world where we can be forced to walk a metre apart and in a one way system. Told we can only order a pint if we order a meal and to only come outside to " clap for the NHS" then it doesn't really seem so strange that a judge in the UK can say
"I hearby order that anyone on this planet no matter where ..will be prosecuted if they ever post online the new identity of this here criminal"
Carr is not the only one.
But this is solely a UK phenomenon.
You never hear of even any American judges trying to pass such laws....even though U.S are the self proclaimed rulers of the earth. |
|
Wyot |
Mr Biden has misunderstood the law and I am happy to clarify the situation.
A judge in England is of course unable to make an order criminalising someone who lives outside of England & Wales and did not in this case attempt to do so.
The judge imposed a rare lifetime annonymity order re Carr (see Section 12 Contempt of Court Act 1981 for more details).
This criminalised publication in England and Wales of her details. "Publication" is now very broad in the social media age and given where servers are hosted etc "England and Wales" can get complicated.
Nevertheless, the question of how a judge can try and make a "world order"? is the product of Mr Biden's imagination, not the statute books or common law.
Because no judge has, in fact, attempted to do so.
Wyot, QC. |
|
Honey |
Donald Biden wrote:
You miss my point.
I am saying....HOW can a judge in the u.k pass a law that covers everyone on earth?
Someone in Iran or Mongolia decides to post all her new details online.....
What can UK cops do?
A judge trying to ban the WORLD from don't something is just absurd. No matter what it is.
But a world ban doesn't actually exist, does it? I thought it meant stopping a British journalist posting her whereabouts in the Mongolian times so the information would trickle back here, for instance?
But come to think of it, what would prevent someone from encouraging the Mongolian journalist to release information on Carr, Venables or Thompson?  |
|
Donald Biden |
You miss my point.
I am saying....HOW can a judge in the u.k pass a law that covers everyone on earth?
Someone in Iran or Mongolia decides to post all her new details online.....
What can UK cops do?
A judge trying to ban the WORLD from don't something is just absurd. No matter what it is. |
|
robbiex |
Donald Biden wrote:
The most baffling part of the story is the idea the entire planets population is forbidden from revealing her new identity forever.
Since when did ONE U.K court dictate to the whole world?
Of course, her identity can't be revealed. She will be ripped to shreds by the morons with a pitchfork mentality. The same idiots that think Jimmy Saville's bones should be dug up and thrashed, for whatever reason. |
|
|
|
