cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: "My words are not dangerous..."
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
hedda Honey wrote:
JK2006 wrote:
Is he drug addled? I don't know. Never met him.
Is he a blackmailer? I doubt it but I don't know.
Is he the saviour? Doubt it.
Does the media inflate? Yes.
That's my point.


Yes. I agree. It should have been reproduced in full or not at all.

The rest, is from their own mouths, incredibly.


the Mail is hilarious with a Harry lookalike claiming he's in danger now.

errr..shave your half beard of and dye your hair black problem solved.
Honey JK2006 wrote:
Is he drug addled? I don't know. Never met him.
Is he a blackmailer? I doubt it but I don't know.
Is he the saviour? Doubt it.
Does the media inflate? Yes.
That's my point.


Yes. I agree. It should have been reproduced in full or not at all.

The rest, is from their own mouths, incredibly.
Honey JK2006 wrote:
Yes that's exactly it WYOT and Honey - we are all entitled to make up our own minds about anyone and whether or not we depend on media coverage. But this is ABOUT media coverage. Should News items be covered with an agenda? And "boasting" is very much part of an agenda. I resent that.The boasting, (or not boasting. None of us are mind readers) is relevant and of interest as part of the bigger picture of grandiose narcissism and coercion, not by itself, which would be pretty dull.
JK2006 Yes that's exactly it WYOT and Honey - we are all entitled to make up our own minds about anyone and whether or not we depend on media coverage. But this is ABOUT media coverage. Should News items be covered with an agenda? And "boasting" is very much part of an agenda. I resent that.
Wyot JK2006 wrote:


But it's not "stupid" to fail to see the magnitude of the reaction to the hype.


Perhaps so. However, it is stupid if he did not anticipate the hype occurring in the first place. But of course he did, despite his protestations of innocence. But I get you are commentating on media while me and Honey are exercised about Harry!

Two different subjects, really. Though enjoying a mutual feeding frenzy currently, and hard to distinguish in all the thrashing.