cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: "More diverse"
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Green Man Wyot wrote:
It doesn't. They are not concerned with judging artistic merit; these people are willing to sacrifice quality of outcome for a political agenda. They politicise everything, including the arts. The right won the economic arguments, the left are winning/terrorising the social arguments in the West. It is their new home. And I'm a secular age full of young people who seek purpose: it is a new religion.

If you don't go with Hollyweird mafia you are blacklisted.
Wyot It doesn't. They are not concerned with judging artistic merit; these people are willing to sacrifice quality of outcome for a political agenda. They politicise everything, including the arts. The right won the economic arguments, the left are winning/terrorising the social arguments in the West. It is their new home. And I'm a secular age full of young people who seek purpose: it is a new religion.
Green Man It's not called Hollyweird for nothing.
JK2006 in other words "less reflective of talent".
Am I being stupid to wonder why the colour of skin or religious belief or sexual orientation should influence judgement of artistic ability?
It really confuses me.