Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Nadhim
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
JK2006 |
"Clear there has been a serious breach" says the Prime Minister.
What he MEANS is - the media wanted a great story so they wanted me to sack Nadhim. I clearly have NO sense of loyalty (see Boris) and huge awareness of media power. So I asked a minor civil service to "investigate" (i.e. to find a reason to fire Nadhim - after all, who cares who is Chairman of a party?). My mistake, however, is to trust the media which, clearly, is now dedicated to get rid of me and bring back Boris (even Labour supporting media would LOVE this to happen, believing Boris is actually a disaster waiting to happen). I'm too stupid to spot that Nadhim is VERY popular with stupid Tories in the country (they even liked Truss, for God's sake). I've got to be PM! I shall succeed!! The media will love me.
Big mistake. |
|
JK2006 |
Gove and others say "it is important a decision is NOT made before investigation". In which case why are police allowed to describe False Accusers as "VICTIMS" and called "credible and true" before investigation?
But also - should Government be run by media? Just because Nadim's behaviour was "a great story" should he be sacked? The "thorough investigation" (in a few hours) only found him GUILTY because the media wanted "a great story".
GUILTY until presumed INNOCENT has become the morality of this species this century. |
|
|
|
