cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Prime Minister's Question Time
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 Am I mad? Am I the only person who considers "victims" to include those victims of False Allegations (the exploding crime of this Century)? Both Slimy Starmer and Silly Sunak go on about "victims" meaning those claiming sexual abuse of some kind, most imaginary or inflated. But we all know and accept there ARE genuine victims of abuse. So why can't anybody admit there are also - ALSO - victims of other crimes, like Sir Edward Heath, Harvey Proctor and others (Gambo, Cliff, Tarbuck, Davidson, Savile - the list is endless)?
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2025 King of Hits.co.uk