cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: CCRC say with pride
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 This really does sum up the CCRC. With the best intentions they are simply unable to cope with the mountain of appeal requests - I reckon about 20% deserving of quashing convictions and another 60% far inflated and exaggerated (in order to get conviction and media attention), deserving a lesser sentence, if one at all.
Instead they concentrate on easy, long dead, stupid cases like these or else easy (to bump up the results) follow ons like the appalling Post Office ones.

Then they can say Look we're referred 2% instead of Sorry we've let down 98% of our applicants.

www.theguardian.com/law/2023/aug/04/case...rts?CMP=share_btn_tw
JK2006 They are busy getting convictions quashed (for dead people in 1977! for Post Office victims - easy pickings) whilst rejecting 98% of those who request their help. Oh for God's sale CCRC - you are fooling nobody. You are NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE.

www.theguardian.com/law/2023/aug/04/case...rts?CMP=share_btn_tw
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2025 King of Hits.co.uk