King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: More on Malkinson
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Wyot	This tragic case does seem to reveal an institutional bias in the CCRC towards assuming fair convictions. Which is a little like your GP having an assumption you are in perfect health when you visit. Stuff will be missed...
JK2006	This is SOOO important because it shows that the CCRC - who had this evidence of Failure to Disclose when they TWICE rejected Malkinson's applicatiuon - are NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE. They consider something not to pass the Real Possibility test when it is declared by Court of Appeal judges that it DOES pass the test. How many other decisions have the CCRC got wrong?
JK2006	Two quotes from the Judgement - Ed Henry KC (for Malkinson) on police Failure to Disclose evidence. The Court of Appeal finds the conviction must be quashed. 64 Mr Henry has, however, persuaded us that the failure to disclose these photographs was highly material. 65 We accept Mr Henry’s submission that, if the photographs had been disclosed, the jury’s verdicts may have been different.