cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Covid
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Green Man Since the lockdowns the public have changed and it's not pretty.
Wyot In all the enquiry submissions the narrative is: save lives with lockdowns versus harming the economy?

www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-67479548

Let's grant that lockdowns saved somelives. The question surely then should have been: save lives with lockdowns now versus save lives by not locking down and not harming the economy?

Why could no one in power apparently comprehend (even in what they took for private correspondence) that harming the economy and the physical and mental health of a country will lead to death as well?

Why was the narrative so unrelentingly, childishly simple?
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2025 King of Hits.co.uk