Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: One rule for one
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
Wyot |
Honey wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:
Well, if the judge says Fox was mistaken, he must have been, but I can understand why he may have THOUGHT that the man simulating masturbation with a giant fake penis to a crowd of children might have been a paedophile. 
The judge was not saying Fox was mistaken in saying the two are peadophiles; neither was the judge saying the two aren't paedophiles.
He (or she) was saying Fox had no evidential basis to make his categorical assertion on a public forum, and so defamed the two concerned (who I know nothing about).
It doesn't matter what Fox thought. Fox though tries to make it a matter of the judge defending gay "paedos" over white straight warriors for truth like him who fight for "freedom of speech".
When it was just about the (correct from what I have read) application of defamation law.
Fox had all the freedom in the world (defamation laws pointedly uphold freedom of thought) to criticise their behaviours (we live in a free society) and also suggest to they might be paedophiles as a result.
But this distinction is apparently lost on him.
This story is just about defamation law, nothing else. Yet of course Fox and so many others want it to be an extreme: the death of free society!!!!! |
|
Green Man |
Honey wrote:
Wyot wrote:
He claimed, from a very high online profile position, and without any evidence, that two people were paedophiles. Online vitriol can destroy lives and careers. I hope there are more cases like this. Fox is a bitter man, who's career in my view was unjustly curtailed. But he should find more positive and intelligent ways to move forward.
Well, if the judge says Fox was mistaken, he must have been, but I can understand why he may have THOUGHT that the man simulating masturbation with a giant fake penis to a crowd of children might have been a paedophile.
We know why Honey! |
|
Green Man |
Al Gershwin wrote:
No justice then - just the law of the jungle, with wild west rules.
Whats wrong with that. Sounds like you had one easy childhood! If you called the police the situation got more worse. |
|
Honey |
Wyot wrote:
He claimed, from a very high online profile position, and without any evidence, that two people were paedophiles. Online vitriol can destroy lives and careers. I hope there are more cases like this. Fox is a bitter man, who's career in my view was unjustly curtailed. But he should find more positive and intelligent ways to move forward.
Well, if the judge says Fox was mistaken, he must have been, but I can understand why he may have THOUGHT that the man simulating masturbation with a giant fake penis to a crowd of children might have been a paedophile. |
|
Al Gershwin |
No justice then - just the law of the jungle, with wild west rules. |
|
|
|
