cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Queens. TWO sets in the men's final? WHAT??
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 Sporting talent should not be based on the short attention spans of spectators. Stamina and ability to come back (perfect example - Novak) make tennis fantastic at 5 sets.
robbiex In non grand slam events, both mens and women's tennis are the best of 3 sets, and quite rightly so. There is little appetite for 5 sets in smaller tournaments. It tests the patience of the spectators having to watch the same 2 players for upto 5 hours. The doubles events are now reduced to 2 sets in non grand slam events, with a tie-break if its 1 set each. People have short attention spans leave days.
JK2006 Obviously I rooted for the Italian and in five sets he could have won. Why only two sets? Women I understand - they have no energy and collapse after a couple of tough rallies. But men? No stamina for fewer than 5 sets? Rubbish.
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2025 King of Hits.co.uk