cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Lucy Letby latest
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 I do not know enough to make a judgement either way. That is the problem with humanity (and the system) today. Superficial opinions from uninformed observers whose only source of information is the media.
Wyot Carl wrote:
She's as guilty as sin.

She may be Carl but to anyone thoughtful about the subject, this is not the point.
Carl She's as guilty as sin.
Wyot hedda wrote:
I say this case should have a thorough investigation.

My friend who is an NHS nurse thinks likewise.

I agree. But the problem is what you investigate?

She was unsuccessful on appeal because her team was not allowed to introduce scientists/experts to refute the prosecutions2 expert witnesses. This was because the defence could have done so at the initial trial, but did not do so.

An appeal must be based on the original trial material and/or process, which must be deemed at fault.

I don't think anything as complex as this (evidentially) should be left to a jury. It is not with certain fraud/money trials which are deemed too specialist.

The people who dealt with this - from Police to jury were simply not qualified to do so. Cases like this need some kind of specialist independent medical/scientific panel review to establish what the case to answer, in the first place, could reasonably be said to be.

To leave a case as complex as this to an adversarial system of trial is barmy...
BarntheBarn She's almost certainly a scapegoat victim. Poor girl.
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2025 King of Hits.co.uk