King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Well done American media
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
hedda	No10 Mole wrote: To the right? Check this out; Starmer more extreme than Corbyn. youtu.be/CqEVBynlc9c?si=IC_TKd_Xu0GMR8GV Interesting..always preferred Peter Hitchens to his late brother. Corbyn's policies weren't even that extreme and existed under both Conservative and Labour governments 30 / 40 years ago.
No10 Mole	To the right? Check this out; Starmer more extreme than Corbyn. youtu.be/CqEVBynlc9c?si=IC_TKd_Xu0GMR8GV
hedda	Rich wrote: JK2006 wrote: Don't agree Hedda. The past use of papers by Murdoch and the Mail was really damaging, in my opinion; the vast majority of voters are stupid and will be swayed. We end up with those who have interesting looks and charisma (like Boris - and Trump) or are prepared to obey media instruction (like Starmer). I admire those US media who refuse to endorse (though I'm sure there will be many Editorials and commentaries). I'm still amazed that the Sun endorsed Starmer at the election. A huge mistake. It would have spoken more for the real mood of the nation if it had refused to endorse anyone. Makes you wonder why they felt they had to do so. The Sun endorsing Labour just proves how far to the right UK Labour have moved to get Rupert's endorsement. I wonder how all this play out as the Murdochs wrangle in court as to who will inherit the empire..ultra conservative Lachan or the 3 other siblings who More liberal minded.
Rich	JK2006 wrote: Don't agree Hedda. The past use of papers by Murdoch and the Mail was really damaging, in my opinion; the vast majority of voters are stupid and will be swayed. We end up with those who have interesting looks and charisma (like Boris - and Trump) or are prepared to obey media instruction (like Starmer). I admire those US media who refuse to endorse (though I'm sure there will be many Editorials and commentaries). I'm still amazed that the Sun endorsed Starmer at the election. A huge mistake. It would have spoken more for the real mood of the nation if it had refused to endorse anyone. Makes you wonder why they felt they had to do so.
hedda	The Wall Street Journal was going to endorse Harris but Bezos stopped them. Nothing to do JK with gallantry on the newspaper's past but more like cowardice. And of course dozens of newspapers around America are endorsing candidates both Harris and Trump.