cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Labour attacking the poor.
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Green Man I prefer the latter.

Next question.
Downing Street Cat Green Man wrote:
It's not free here either, it comes out of our taxes. The government don't have their own money.

So GM what would you prefer? Higher taxation or a private health service and expensive insurance and Astronomical medical bills? And as we already know with the trains, post office.....private doesn't mean better than public.
Green Man It's not free here either, it comes out of our taxes. The government don't have their own money.
Nick The population of Luxembourg is 1% that of the United Kingdom.
Al Gershwin You mentioned Luxembourg - excellent/free public transport. But, for example, health care isn't free there; €58 to see a doctor, and many other charges which aren't applicable here - like those for ambulances.