Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Labour thug
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
Green Man |
Wyot wrote:
Prescott's punch was superior precisely because it was a functional piece of retaliation, deftly delivered by a man who got things done.
Amesbury's assault was excessive, clumsy and bordering on masturbatory. This, I think, is a fair comparison between their respective Governments so far...
I have no problem of sticking up to themselves like Two Jags did but Mike Amesbury is a vile hooligan. |
|
Wyot |
Prescott's punch was superior precisely because it was a functional piece of retaliation, deftly delivered by a man who got things done.
Amesbury's assault was excessive, clumsy and bordering on masturbatory. This, I think, is a fair comparison between their respective Governments so far... |
|
hedda |
Wyot wrote:
[quote]Green Man wrote:
Chris wrote:
Punching a bloke in the street, Starmer will suspend him and hope it gets swept under the rug or he uses a distaction like the Budget. An average bloke would be in the docks and be sent to prison.
I thought Prescott's punch all those years ago was superior - he knew what he was doing! Better times....
Indeed the "Prescot Punch was a beauty and seemed to have endeared him to the people.
This current events must surely mean the attacker will do jail time. |
|
Green Man |
Wyot wrote:
[quote]Green Man wrote:
Chris wrote:
Punching a bloke in the street, Starmer will suspend him and hope it gets swept under the rug or he uses a distaction like the Budget. An average bloke would be in the docks and be sent to prison.
I thought Prescott's punch all those years ago was superior - he knew what he was doing! Better times....
Another fat, sleezeball. However he was provoked, Mike Amesbury threw and landed the first punch and carried on, whilst the guy was on the ground. |
|
Rich |
There's no comparing Prescott's punch at the 2001 election to this Amesbury bully.
Prescott just acted instantly and instinctively in the moment while sober with one quick go . Many of us might have done that. Whereas Amesbury carried out a sustained attack with a man flat on his back who had not physically done him any harm. Perhaps it's not the first time Amesbury has behaved like this in his life, just the time he got caught.
So why hasn't he been charged yet when the evidence is clear. Others in the summer had been arrested, charged and jailed inside a week.
The recall petition against him must surely be a foregone conclusion I hope. |
|
|
|
