cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Immigration - why can nobody answer my solution?
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
hedda Nearly 100,000 Brits emigrate every year and around 600,000 die each year.

Very much doubt asylum seekers number that many.
Green Man
Green Man Keir Starmer it's done by design and purpose.



www.youtube.com/watchv=6Odj2KKYGcg&pp=wgIGCgQQAhgB
Wyot I like the idea in principal, and its humanity.

Clearly those coming in on the ferries would immediately be processed and possibly held and many sent back on them.

I suspect a parallel criminal market would spring up though for those who just want to arrive and vanish.
JK2006 Very low price cheap ferries put on several times a week with tight security on landing. It would cut the smugglers out completely (money talks but lack of profits shout). It would have little effect on those trying to come in but would save the cost and effort of policing the Channel. It simplifies the process of entrance (and exit). It has little to do with "should we let more people in" - it just stops death and saves millions of wasted funds.