cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Kenya
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Anthony You're right, zooloo. I think everyone is right in their own way on this thread and it takes us full circle back to Chrissy's original post. The self-destructiveness of humanity.
zooloo Anthony wrote:
I see where you are coming from, zooloo, but that wasn't my angle, either consciously or subconsciously.

You can't deny that before Western colonization, Africa had a totally different system. We imposed our values on them and left them in a mess. Without our intervention, they would have been able to develop according to their own cultural needs and in their own time.[/quote]
I have very little idea of the political situation in Africa before western involvement - except that some tribes captured and sold other tribes as slaves.

If that is so then the inter-tribal problems pre-exist colonial involvement and what we see is a return to pre-colonial ways.

With the caveat that my opinion isn't a particularly informed one what I think is this is an example of early democracy.

Before you reach the European level it takes many years for the culture and institutions to become ingrained enough to resist/accommodate change.

An example for the UK is Scotland, I remember a fellow on the World Service explaining that Scottish "independence" wouldn't mean any large scale or significant changes, because the institutions are so well established.

Europe went through the same turmoil as some parts of Africa the main difference being bows and arrows rather than guns and rockets.
Anthony zooloo wrote:
[b]
It seems to me to be a very "colonial" attitude to suggest current problems are due to the colonials.

After all those primitive peoples will fight amongst themselves without the white hand of reason to sort it out.


I see where you are coming from, zooloo, but that wasn't my angle, either consciously or subconsciously.

You can't deny that before Western colonization, Africa had a totally different system. We imposed our values on them and left them in a mess. Without our intervention, they would have been able to develop according to their own cultural needs and in their own time.
zooloo The Cat wrote:
Western powers may have altered the make up of certain African states, but the way some Kenyans are behaving today is entirely their own decision. They have the choice to follow peace or violence; and they have chosen violence. It's a 'cop out' to blame history.
Agreed.

It seems to me to be a very "colonial" attitude to suggest current problems are due to the colonials.

After all those primitive peoples will fight amongst themselves without the white hand of reason to sort it out.

In The Know The Cat wrote:
They have the choice to follow peace or violence; and they have chosen violence.

It's hard not to agree - but undoubtedly also true that had (for example) the ANC not challenged the white supremacists of South Africa they would still be slaves today.