cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: My 2001 wongful conviction quashed
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Downing Street Cat So unless you owned a TARDIS you couldn't possibly have committed the 'offences' in London on given dates. Unjust is an under statement. I really do pray that you find justice before long.
JK2006 The CCRC justification for refusing to allow my appeal to be heard 20 years ago was "WHEN it happened doesn't matter - it's WHETHER it happened that counts". In a case involving the age of consent? Bonkers!
JK2006 Read the post Mart - SHOULD be acquitted of all - the first 5 currently still stand though the dozens of others failed.
Green Man I want to know why the courts are scared of journos, they are just pen pushers with narcissistic personalities.
Martin Hutchinson Does this mean that you are legally cleared of ALL alleged offences?
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2025 King of Hits.co.uk