cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Councils trying to ban hotels
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Lester Pidgeon BBC News - Badenoch encourages Tory councils to challenge asylum hotels


www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwy0j9n4qzwo
hedda I used to really like that TV program The Hotel Inspector (which is also on Yoo Toob).

There must be 100s of small almost empty hotels that would relish filling up with migrants at government expense.

They could house the homeless as well.

Actually I had a late pal who had a small hotel in South London where he made a fortune from housing the homeless at local council expense. He reckoned they were a nightmare to deal with.

The migrants seem quite well behaved,
Honey JK2006 wrote:
No the argument used by the Council was that the protests were causing dangerous problems, specifically for children on their way to school. If such disruption is a reason to close a housing unit, it must surely also be a reason to close the Royal Courts during protests that disrupt traffic, causing potential accidents to school children trying to get to school.

They can argue it until they are blue in the face, but it was the breach of regulations that shut it down.

Granted, without the protest it might have gone unnoticed.
JK2006 No the argument used by the Council was that the protests were causing dangerous problems, specifically for children on their way to school. If such disruption is a reason to close a housing unit, it must surely also be a reason to close the Royal Courts during protests that disrupt traffic, causing potential accidents to school children trying to get to school.
Honey JK2006 wrote:
Epping Forest has won a vital judicial point at the Royal Courts of Justice - Westminster Council HAS to ask the Court to decree that, if there are peaceful protests outside the building, the potential traffic chaos must mean there is a danger to passing school children on their way to class and, from mid September, the Royal Courts building must be closed when protests are taking place outside it.

It was nothing to do with protests in Epping.
They changed the use of the building and broke the regulations.
But that wasn't much of a story.