cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Very interesting re Jeremy Bamber
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 Like Lucy Letby I've said many times that I have no idea of guilt or innocence in cases where I simply do not have enough specific, detailed evidence. TRIALS, though, should have and often do NOT - frequently because defence teams have neither the time nor inclination to examine in as much depth as police or CPS. Ditto the CCRC which ought to devote equal time, expense and effort, if not more, to investigation. A very few media people (such as Woffinden or Kennedy) do this and the link is worth reading.

empowerinnocent.wixsite.com/ccrcwatch/po...-court-of-appeal-now
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2025 King of Hits.co.uk