Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: The "Royals"
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
Anthony |
ITK has said nothing deserving of reproach on this thread.
My views on the Royal family:-
Abolish them? What's the point? We could share all their wealth amongst ourselves and have a few quid each at best.
Revere them? Why? A bunch of in-bred oddities, who enjoy massive privilege through accidents of birth.
They are totally irrelevant in my world, and not really worth an opinion one way or the other, though clearly I have made an exception on this occasion.
We may as well leave them alone to live their odd lifestyles in peace. |
|
Al |
Pete, you should take the advice you gave me. Don't even engage this guy. We'd get more sense from a brick. |
|
In The Know |
Pete Clarke wrote:
[quote]
You |
|
Pete Clarke |
ITK, you are perfectly entitled to your views, on this and any other subject.
But, what really grates on me are your constant personal attacks on individuals who, as a result of whatever kind of circumstances (sometimes totally beyond their own control), find themselves in a position whereby you feel it is appropriate to attack them.
Be it Princes or Prostitutes...
Take Harry & Wills, two lads who have been under the most unimaginable media scrutiny more or less ever since the day they were born. They have seen their mother both canonised and vilified by the media, and then ultimately hounded and killed by them. They were just boys when this happened. They then had to suffer years of subsequent |
|
oskar |
ITK....almost correct. '50 Catholic' point is wrong ....Henry IIX for example; Catholics only started then in the 1500's. Still JK won't know - in another world ! |
|
|
|
