cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: The right to vote
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
veritas I agree..all we really have in just about the entire western world now is 2 main political parties that are almost identical.

30 years ago it was so different. Although I come from a long line of Labour Party people , there was always respect for both sides as most MPs really were sort of more "idealistic".

Now they're really in for all the rorts they can get when they leave office.
R T Mason On the sbject of Churchill, after the public had given someone "better suited to peace time" a chance, they again voted for Churchill. So let's not dismiss his contributions to this nations so easily.

As for present day elections. The fact is that somebody will be elected to government whether we consider voting a waste of time or not. We usually have choices of fringe candidates. In the Hartlepool elections for Mayor, the people voted for the mascot of the local football team who stood as a joke candidate. They did this as a protest against mainstream politics. This mascot had dressed as a monkey throughout the campaign, and he was a loner who lived with his parents (a psychological profiler's dream), but once elected he proved to be a very good mayor (minus the monkey suit). He was then re-elected and remains in office today. So the fringe candidates might not always be a waste of a vote. If you're fed up with mainstream politics, give your vote to a no-hoper'. If enough people do that, things might indeed change.
JK2006 I must agree with you Teddy - I just got my voting form and thought "really, why bother? It makes no difference - they are all useless and terrified of brain dead tabloid headline writers".
ReadyTeddy Yes, time moves on and the public wanted a new leader - one who was better suited to peacetime, but what we need now is a leader with a similar sence of purpose and a good way of getting public support. A leader to lead us - not flounder.
zooloo Lets also look to how Churchill did in the post-war election while we are eulogising him and creating myths.