Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: The PEOPLE fight back against New Labour Child Abuse
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
Angel |
The younger the jab is administered the higher the success rate BR. It has nothing to do with New Labour encouraging under age sex. Appropriate and necessary in my book. |
|
BR |
The article is written by the BBC. If you have listened to debates on say Radio 2 or 5 Live you will have heard the real story.
In addition 30% of parents have refused the jab nationally.
This is people power.
The majority of calls I heard on the Radio 2 phone in were supportive of the jab if it were done outside schools and was a free choice.
We are seeing advertising pushing people into having jabs they dont need.
I take it you realise that the jab is not against Cervical Cancer it is against a Sexually Transmitted disease.
Therefore for the majority of girls - especially under 16 - it is quite inappropriate and unecessary. Unless New Labour are actively encouraging Children to have sex under the age of 16 years old - in which case they should re-write the laws regarding consent. |
|
zooloo |
If you read the article you will find they claim it is not a moral stand.
Your point is moot. |
|
BR |
All schools indoctrinate end of.
Whether it is a faith school or not they all have their "ethos" Take a top public school like Eton or Harrow - just because they are not Faith schools does not mean they don't turn out a "certain type" of student.
Even home education would be biased towards the beliefs of the Parents.
So basically it is not really child abuse ! Unless it is being done against their will and as far as I am aware kids choose their Secondary Schools these days.
Therefore if you choose a Roman Catholic School it would follow that you would agree with the stand this school has taken on this jab. And that would be fair - in the same way a Jewish school would insist no non Kosher food was served etc.
People should be allowed to have beliefs - even if you we dont necessarily agree with them. To suggest that these beliefs are abuse is too strong a word. Yes children will have a biased upbringing - but I would say unless they are brought up in a closed community they are likely to be able to exercise some freewill.
After all we see today a Vicar in Wales convicted of Child Pornography charges. He exercised his free will outside of what you and I would think his beliefs would support. Therefore, i think the jab should be a matter of choice - not pushed down the throats of kids where they are learning.
I might add that I refused every jab at school in my secondary years when offered. That is because I had the freewill even back then to realise that education came first and my Doctor would advise me about my health - not my teachers or the Nanny state - neither of them are professionals.
It is like asking an electrician to do a plumbing job or a brain surgeon to do a prolapse. You deal with the expert where possible.
Our government has set itself up as the expert on EVERYTHING when in fact they do not understand ANYTHING. |
|
Anthony |
How did I know it would be a religious school, even before clicking the link? Must be developing psychic powers in my old age. Hardly a case of "the people" fighting back, is it?
There is validity in your arguments, BR, but some pragmatism is required. Kids should be taught responsibility for their actions, but no-one can ever stop all of them giving into their natural urges, and denying them a vaccination which will save lives is irresponsible.
Are faith schools themselves not a form of child abuse? Indoctrinating the youth, killing off individual thought and replacing it with ancient superstitious religious scripture. I think so. |
|
|
|
