Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Sara Payne appointed to office
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
I'm Not A Celebrity |
BR wrote:
I would say that that the EASTENDERS GIRL whose brother was stabbed or the LAWRENCE parent would be easily better than Sara Payne.
Sara Payne has been a PUPPET of the NotW ( NWO )
She is a mouthpiece for bitterness and hatred in my view.
Her daughter died and that is very sad - but she has campaigned for an unfair and counter productive law.
Victims already have massive funding from Central Government - they can advocate in court when their case is won - and they have support groups funded by the taxpayer.
Therefore I cant see why they have appointed her ? it does not make any sense ? except to once more HIDE THE TRUE FACTS about the deep abusive culture that exists in the UK - amongst those in power and in the media.
Again...a good post from BR. Most registered paedophiles DO NOT kill children. Violent thugs do!! Sarah Payne's entire campaign is media led, and one can only assume that she has of course been walked like a stupid dog on the scent of some glorious stick thrown by the tabloids. I feel sorry for her as she's a victim all over again. |
|
I'm Not A Celebrity |
Good points JC. The fact that most children who are abused or murdered are done so in their own homes by their parents/stepparents, and more importantly by people who ARE NOT on the sex offenders register. Those who inflict physical abuse on children are NOT placed on any register at all. The case of Baby P immediately springs to mind. More children are at risk from physical violence than sexual abuse. Thugs who kill children with fists appear not to feature in Sarah Payne's 'Saviour of Little Angels' project. |
|
BR |
I would say that that the EASTENDERS GIRL whose brother was stabbed or the LAWRENCE parent would be easily better than Sara Payne.
Sara Payne has been a PUPPET of the NotW ( NWO )
She is a mouthpiece for bitterness and hatred in my view.
Her daughter died and that is very sad - but she has campaigned for an unfair and counter productive law.
Victims already have massive funding from Central Government - they can advocate in court when their case is won - and they have support groups funded by the taxpayer.
Therefore I cant see why they have appointed her ? it does not make any sense ? except to once more HIDE THE TRUE FACTS about the deep abusive culture that exists in the UK - amongst those in power and in the media. |
|
JC |
So far she hasn't shown any signs of fair mind or good reasoning. She's campaigned heavily for the naming and shaming of everyone on the sex offenders register, regardless of whether they pose a threat or not. She's been voicing her opinions for the last few years and comes across as very bitter and negative. I doubt that she will suddenly develope a sense of reason now that she's been given a position of influence.
Like many, she seems oblivious to the fact that people make false allegations. Her position is that victims must be given priority over the accused, even before it is proven that a crime has been committed. If the accused is acquitted, it means the criminal has 'got away with it'. Not a good or fair attitude. |
|
JK2006 |
I hate the concept, agree with the negative points, loathe the government by tabloid aspect, hate the idea of victims having any part of justice (they will always be biased and understandably so but justice must be impartial) but...
the facts on all these angles do not allow us to condemn the lady herself without giving her a chance.
She may prove to be fair minded and helpful.
Her first move, in my opinion, should be to campaign for the VICTIMS of false allegations. |
|
|
|
