Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: 7.7 BBC Programme
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
steveimp |
Locked Out wrote:
Erm... were you watching the same pogramme as me, BR? It certainly doesn't sound like it. I wanted so much {sorry for the Karen Matthews impersonation, JK} to learn something of interest from it and I indeed did. It wasn't what I wanted to hear, but it was useful to see the view from the other side of the fence. The cynicism of the Ripple Effect DVD is truly breathtaking, something which must offend any decent human being. I'm far from convinced that this government is as clean as a whistle. But I'm satisfied that the truthfulness of Ripple Effect has been seriously and successfully challenged. It's important to remember one maxim; Be open minded, but not so much so that your brain falls out... Ripple Effect 7.7 is a lie. And you may take it from me that I'm not a government stooge.
Like Loose Change 2nd Edition, which was totally ludicrous with a suggestion that all the passengers from all the planes all got out at a airport before they put up "clone" planes to hit the Twin Towers.
Ripple Effect has it's moments to make you think, but it does have those crazy moments like Loose Change that makes you weary. |
|
steveimp |
mikemacca wrote:
Just sensationalism TV, nothing more.
It's what Chris Morris said in Brass Eye ten years ago:
"We will be telling you what to think, next." |
|
mikemacca |
Just sensationalism TV, nothing more. |
|
steveimp |
JK2006 wrote:
Thought it was mixed and strange BR - not convinced either way.
I've just seen it on my iPhone in a cold bath, so I could seriously concentrate on it.
I thought it was no different to 7/7 Ripple Effect or any of the 'conspiracy' documentaries, and indeed with it's total agreement for the Government's own 'conspiracy theory', it basically is as useful as those who argue it.
In any case, would you expect the BBC to come against the Government's own report? Of course not.
The whole idea about "the bombers throwing away their ID so that they could be identified" was just ludicrous and came across as very, very silly, but you know, the sheeple out there will accept it because the BBC said it.
I don't accept Maud Dib's doc, or David Shaylers, and I certainly don't accept the BBC's either. It's all smoke and mirrors. |
|
Al |
I didn't see the programme, but I think I'd need more than five minutes of one TV programme to convince me one way or the other. |
|
|
|
